QuickBird Medical
  • Case Studies
    • Case Studies
    • Customers
  • Services
    • Development: DiGA
    • Development: Medical Software
    • Development: Health Apps
    • Development: Wearables for Medical Devices
    • Development: Decision Support Systems
    • Development: Medical AI Systems
    • Legal Manufacturer for Medical Devices
    • BSI TR-03161 for DiGA
    • ePA & Health ID for DiGA
    • Support for your Software Team
    • Further Services
  • Insights
  • Team
  • Jobs
  • Contact
  • German
Select Page
NUB as Cost Reimbursement for Software Products in Hospitals

NUB as Cost Reimbursement for Software Products in Hospitals

by Daniel Lange | Oct 6, 2025 | Medical Software, medical-software-whitepaper

Even today, hospital operations without IT are hardly conceivable, as hacker attacks unfortunately often demonstrate. However, digital innovations such as AI-supported diagnostic software and clinical decision support systems promise to fundamentally improve patient...
Class I Software according to MDR – is that still possible? (September 2025)

Class I Software according to MDR – is that still possible? (September 2025)

by Alexander Fenkiw | Sep 27, 2025 | medical-software-whitepaper

Are there still Class I software medical devices according to MDR? Are regulatory authorities really withdrawing Class I software products from the market in droves? Which federal state do I need to go to in order to remain on the market with my Class I software? As...
Classification of software medical devices: MDR Guideline

Classification of software medical devices: MDR Guideline

by Alexander Fenkiw | Sep 27, 2025 | medical-software-whitepaper

“The use of my app is completely safe. It certainly falls into the lowest risk category.” – MDR probably sees it differently. Anyone who wants to certify their software as a medical device in accordance with the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) must...
Guide: Is your app a medical device?

Guide: Is your app a medical device?

by Malte Bucksch | Sep 27, 2025 | medical-software-whitepaper

That a pacemaker should be a regulated medical device is obvious. However, with software, especially apps, the ambiguity is greater. Mobile apps must also be classified as a regulated medical device if they are used for specific purposes such as the diagnosis or...
Innovation Fund (2025): Funding for digital health solutions

Innovation Fund (2025): Funding for digital health solutions

by Daniel Lange | Jun 13, 2025 | medical-software-whitepaper

Many manufacturers of medical software and health apps are faced with the question: How can digital solutions be used to build a sustainable business model? The market for self-paying patients in the German healthcare system is relatively small, and the path to...
All insights: Development and approval of software medical devices in 2025

All insights: Development and approval of software medical devices in 2025

by Daniel Lange | Feb 5, 2025 | medical-software-whitepaper, Unkategorisiert

Over the past ten years, we have learned a great deal about the development of software medical devices. We are pleased to share this expertise in our technical articles with (prospective) developers of Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) so that not everyone has to...
« Older Entries

Insider-Empfehlungen für DiGA-Hersteller in 2025
Downloaden Sie jetzt unser Whitepaper

Insider-Empfehlungen für Software-Medizinprodukt-Hersteller in 2025
Downloaden Sie jetzt unser Whitepaper


Sie planen eine Medical Software oder DiGA?

Sprechen Sie mit unserem Geschäftsführer Malte Bucksch

+49 (0) 89 54998380
kontakt@quickbirdmedical.com
Kontakt

+49 (0) 89 54998380
kontakt@quickbirdmedical.com

 

Whitepaper

13 wichtige Empfehlungen für angehende DiGA-Hersteller 2025

13 wichtige Empfehlungen für angehende Medizinprodukt-Hersteller 2025

Aktuelles

DiGA- und Medical Software-Newsletter

Digital Health Events 2025

Presse – QuickBird in den Medien

© 2025 Impressum | Datenschutz