by Malte Bucksch | Jan 16, 2026 | medical-software-whitepaper, Unkategorisiert
In the currently valid version of the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), there is considerable room for interpretation when it comes to classifying software medical devices. In particular, the distinction between risk classes I and IIa is vaguely worded. Manufacturers,...
by Alexander Fenkiw | Jan 15, 2026 | medical-software-whitepaper
“Clinical evaluation? No problem!” “A doctor was recently interviewed in the Süddeutsche Zeitung! She clearly stated that mindfulness apps help with depression. We can refer to that, can’t we?” Unfortunately, it’s not that simple....
by Alexander Fenkiw | Jan 15, 2026 | medical-software-whitepaper
Are there still Class I software medical devices according to MDR? Are regulatory authorities really withdrawing Class I software products from the market in droves? Which federal state do I need to go to in order to remain on the market with my Class I software? As...
by Alexander Fenkiw | Jan 15, 2026 | medical-software-whitepaper
“The use of my app is completely safe. It certainly falls into the lowest risk category.”- MDR probably sees it differently. Anyone who wants to certify their software as a medical device in accordance with the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) must deal...
by Daniel Lange | Jan 9, 2026 | medical-software-whitepaper, Unkategorisiert
The development of software medical devices is complex, and unfortunately, high-quality information on the subject is limited on the internet. We have been developing software medical devices for customers on a contract basis for over 10 years. During this time, we...
by Alexander Fenkiw | Jan 9, 2026 | medical-software-whitepaper
Anyone involved in the development of software medical devices is certainly no stranger to the term “Quality management system” (QMS). You may also have heard of ISO 13485 in this context. ISO 13485 is a standard that defines the requirements for a quality...